| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Ditts | 9 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 28 | 78% |
| 2. Palmer | 9 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 24 | 67% |
| 3. White Scarborough | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 12 | 33% |
| 4. Team Hunt | 9 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 10 | 17 | -7 | 8 | 22% |
| 5. Martin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| 6. Cardwell | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| 7. Thorne | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| 8. McKay | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
| Palmer | White Scarborough | Team Hunt | Ditts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palmer |
White Scarborough won!
0-1-68 — 3-9-103
|
Palmer won!
0-3-105 — 3-9-129
|
Ditts won!
0-3-88 — 3-9-125
|
|
| White Scarborough |
White Scarborough won!
0-1-68 — 3-9-103
|
White Scarborough won!
1-3-81 — 2-7-89
|
Ditts won!
1-4-92 — 2-7-100
|
|
| Team Hunt |
Palmer won!
0-3-105 — 3-9-129
|
White Scarborough won!
1-3-81 — 2-7-89
|
Ditts won!
2-7-84 — 1-3-83
|
|
| Ditts |
Ditts won!
0-3-88 — 3-9-125
|
Ditts won!
1-4-92 — 2-7-100
|
Ditts won!
2-7-84 — 1-3-83
|
Pool B
| Thorne | Martin | Cardwell | McKay | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thorne |
TBD
|
TBD
|
TBD
|
|
| Martin |
TBD
|
TBD
|
TBD
|
|
| Cardwell |
TBD
|
TBD
|
TBD
|
|
| McKay |
TBD
|
TBD
|
TBD
|
